This one in particular is one that I've always loved:
Where the Sidewalk Ends
by Shel Silverstein
There is a place where the sidewalk ends
And before the street begins,
And there the grass grows soft and white,
And there the sun burns crimson bright,
And there the moon-bird rests from his flight
To cool in the peppermint wind.
Let us leave this place where the smoke blows black
And the dark street winds and bends.
Past the pits where the asphalt flowers grow
We shall walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And watch where the chalk-white arrows go
To the place where the sidewalk ends.
Yes we'll walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
And we'll go where the chalk-white arrows go,
For the children, they mark, and the children, they know
The place where the sidewalk ends.
Something happens, alas, when we grow older. We start to lose our connections with things as they are, as they could be, and focus on the negative. There are ills to be cured, for sure, but caring people can and do make a difference every day.
I recently came across this article:
Poverty has grown everywhere in the U.S. in recent years,
but mostly in the suburbs. During the 2000s, it grew twice as fast in suburban
areas as in cities, with more than 16 million poor people now living in the
nation's suburbs — more than in urban or rural areas.
Elizabeth Kneebone, a fellow with the Metropolitan Policy
Program at the Brookings Institution, says this shift in poverty can be seen in
Montgomery County, Md., right outside the nation's capital.
"Montgomery County is one of the wealthiest counties in
the country," she says, noting the streets lined with luxury apartments,
big homes and crowded restaurants. "But it also has a rapidly growing poor
population."
Kneebone, co-author with Alan Berube, of a new book from
Brookings, Confronting Suburban Poverty in America, says poverty in Montgomery
County has grown by two-thirds since the recent recession. That means 30,000
more residents living below the federal poverty line — about $23,000 for a
family of four.
That doesn't buy much in a suburban area with a high cost of
living. By some estimates, a family of four in Montgomery County needs more
than $80,000 a year to meet basic needs.
Hidden Among Affluence
Kneebone says, around the country, the suburban poor live in
low-income and working-class neighborhoods. "But it's also occurring in
places we think of as more affluent," she says. "And, in fact, it may
be even more hidden there because we don't expect to find poverty in those
communities."
On a tour of Montgomery County, Kneebone stops at one place
where the growth in poverty is not a surprise: Manna Food Center in
Gaithersburg, where about two dozen people are lined up for food.
One of them is Polly Maxwell, 64, who walks with the help of
a cane. Maxwell says she started coming here a couple of years ago. After
working 38 years at a local hospital, mostly in medical records, she now lives
on disability checks.
But Maxwell says things have gotten way too expensive. She
spends half of her income on the $800 a month rent for her efficiency
apartment.
"What you were making in two weeks when I was working,
that's what I make a month," Maxwell says. "I mean, it's hard. And I
just never thought it would be like that. So, you have to get used to that, you
know. Some of your money lasts a month, sometimes it doesn't."
And she's hardly alone. This center, like food pantries across
the country, has seen its caseload double since the recession.
Kneebone says Montgomery County is fairly typical. Suburban
poverty has grown nationally because low-income families moved from cities — or
other countries — in search of better schools, affordable housing and jobs. But
she says it's also about people like Polly Maxwell — long-time suburbanites who
have gotten poorer.
"And the Great Recession was particularly severe —
widespread job losses, many of them concentrated in suburban communities hit
hard by the collapse of the housing market and the loss of construction jobs
and related services," Kneebone says. And even though jobs are coming back
to the suburbs, she says many pay too little to make ends meet.
Kneebone says even social services and charities have been
slow to recognize the shift in need. Most of their resources still go to the
nation's cities, where there's a long history of serving the poor.
Shifting Focus Beyond The City
The nonprofit Mary's Center has been providing medical and
other help to the poor for 25 years in the Washington, D.C. area. But until
recently, all of its facilities were located in the city. That changed in 2008,
when it opened a site in Montgomery County, in an area that serves many
immigrants. It opened another suburban center last year.
"We were figuring out that when we were over there at
the other sites that we have in D.C., there was a lot of population from
Maryland who were traveling from here to there," says Zulma Aparicio, site
director of the two suburban locations. "And they were paying fares for
the bus, metro and all of this. And now they continue paying, but it's
closer."
Brookings' Elizabeth Kneebone says that transportation is a
big issue for the suburban poor. Everything is so spread out, it can be hard to
get where you need to go to meet basic needs, especially if you don't own a
car.
But Montgomery County is trying to take steps to address the
problem. The county's Neighborhood Opportunity Network operates three one-stop
shops for struggling families. Pearline Tyson, the network's program manager,
says the county opened the three centers in neighborhoods it knew had been
especially hard-hit by the recession.
"They knew that some people would be intimidated by
going to a [bigger] regional center to apply for benefits. Especially people
who had never received benefits before or who were not familiar with government
services," Tyson says.
Instead, the neighborhood centers are intimate and accessible.
One is located in Gaithersburg, in what looks like a typical suburban office
park. But it's filled with non-profits and social service agencies, instead of
businesses. People who come to the center are assigned a county worker who
helps them navigate what can be a labyrinth of benefit programs and charitable
services.
For Akouavi Davi and her husband, who came here from West
Africa, it's been a godsend. "I'm so happy, because I know I have someone
to help me now," she says.
The family had been getting by on its own until a back
injury forced Davi to give up her job at Wal-Mart. Then their daughter left
their small grandson, Joshua, in their care, and now, only her husband works,
as a security guard.
"We have electricity problem. We have apartment problem.
I have health problem, I don't have insurance," Davi says.
And to complicate matters, she doesn't drive. The family
recently moved from a neighborhood further out in the county, where there are
no buses, to a place near the center, where there are plenty.
Kneebone says when you're poor, geography matters.
Low-income residents can spend long hours trying to get services — time that
might be better spent working, or going to school. She says at least this
county is trying to adjust. Many have yet to do so.
"We're still thinking about poverty where it was in
1964 when President Johnson launched the War on Poverty. The reality on the
ground today is just very different," Kneebone says.
And that reality, she says, is unlikely to change if people
don't know that it's there.
(back to me)
I have written about this before. There is a real problem coming. As property values in aging suburban areas continue to decline, we will find that there is not the revenue required to keep the infrastructure up to date. We sprawled so rapidly and so far that we didn't take into account the bills that would come due in fifty years. Now, it's fifty years on, and we are having to do expensive things to keep these areas going, at the very time when there is less money to take care of it with.
Further exacerbating the problem is the fact that serving these areas with transportation alternatives is unfeasible. So you get more cars driving on more roads, but the cars themselves are in poorer condition, requiring more expensive upkeep. And their inefficiency is another impact on the household budget, with rising fuel prices continuing to bite.
The solution is not easy to find. People moving into inner city areas for various reasons have driven property values up, causing the shift indicated in the article to become accelerated. Inner city areas have been traditionally the less desirable places, but their higher density meant that transit options were easily available, and the infrastructure improvements were not as costly per unit (higher density means more houses served off fewer linear feet of infrastructure). As these places become more chic, attracting younger folks with more money to spend, the gentrification that takes place is exacerbated. Poor folks are shuffled out to the rapidly declining suburbs.
It's going to be interesting to see how things shake out in the next 20 years.
(back to me)
I have written about this before. There is a real problem coming. As property values in aging suburban areas continue to decline, we will find that there is not the revenue required to keep the infrastructure up to date. We sprawled so rapidly and so far that we didn't take into account the bills that would come due in fifty years. Now, it's fifty years on, and we are having to do expensive things to keep these areas going, at the very time when there is less money to take care of it with.
Further exacerbating the problem is the fact that serving these areas with transportation alternatives is unfeasible. So you get more cars driving on more roads, but the cars themselves are in poorer condition, requiring more expensive upkeep. And their inefficiency is another impact on the household budget, with rising fuel prices continuing to bite.
The solution is not easy to find. People moving into inner city areas for various reasons have driven property values up, causing the shift indicated in the article to become accelerated. Inner city areas have been traditionally the less desirable places, but their higher density meant that transit options were easily available, and the infrastructure improvements were not as costly per unit (higher density means more houses served off fewer linear feet of infrastructure). As these places become more chic, attracting younger folks with more money to spend, the gentrification that takes place is exacerbated. Poor folks are shuffled out to the rapidly declining suburbs.
It's going to be interesting to see how things shake out in the next 20 years.
